Welcome! We now have a Wiki for for BeOS & Haiku and would love to get more contributors! To get to it go to https://wiki.beos.retro-os.live/ - if you have any questions just PM me…
Been working on it for a couple weeks but it is now getting ready for use so I thought I would post here…
It’s unlikely that we’ll ever see an equivalent to the BeOS Bible: printed books are sooo twentieth century. This could be the equivalent for us if we all pitch in.
Just to avoid confusion, Haiku itself already has a wiki TitleIndex – Haiku ; But that is about Haiku the OS itself.
Anyhow, I am a bit concerned about all these third party things beeing branded Haiku, especially the mail server. It’s certainly not official or endorsed, but makes the impression as if it would be…
I don’t think that just using the word "Haiku " is enough to cause confusion any more than using the word “mac” means that it is from Apple. Same thing for “win” implies Microsoft…
You can hardly call it “the operating system that may not be named because it belongs to some corporation that has completely forgotten about it & the open-source operating system that can also not be named because it doesn’t have an official endorsement wiki”
Once again thank you very much for offering so many great community services
A Wiki is a nice addition to what we already have.
I think I may write something about native Haiku programming stuff when I find some time,or write guides for the topics I have to answer on the forum over and over again.
That being said,it’s really a shame that your other site has so few activity
The community timeline is 90% just me writing about my BeAIM progress.
“Mac” is hardware. THe appropriate analogy would be “Apple”. I don’t know if there’d be any trouble with an “applemail” site, or a MacOS wiki run by some random user, but I can imagine there’d be some concern, maybe legitimate concern. Does that require explanation?
btw, the appropriate analogy would be “MacOS” which is the name of the operating system as opposed to Haiku.
I appreciate this initiative, thank you @MarisaG for that. I’m more concerned about the competition with BeSly, to be honest. Not because it is not legitimate but there’s a risk to dilute the knowledge which is now spread across two different sources.
Look under “Office”, Gobe Productive, but no Calligra, no LibreOffice. And we’ve had both of those for years now.
I get it. You run out of steam after a while. As Wikipedia has shown, a wiki can be kept up to date. When one set of people drop out, another set can take over.
I agree with @michel here, the BeSly site is really awesome (especially the old one with Haiku-like webdesign, but that may be personal taste) but it lacks some topics that would be interesting to users.
A Wiki offers the possibility to extend it to anyone who cares and wants to invest some time.
If a article already exists, but lacks some details or the things have changed since it has been written, someone else can easily extend or update the article.
BeSly accepts articles from the community, but you have to send it by email and the admins decide if they want to publish it or not.
That’s a higher barrier for entry compared to a Wiki that anyone can easily edit in the browser.
it’s true that we accept articles via email and then publish them. There are several reasons for this.
Firstly, we want to ensure that no illegal entries end up on our site, for which we have to take responsibility.
Another reason is that we had a number of fake users and bots on our site and the time required to administer them was higher than the time needed to enter and publish an article.
Furthermore, we usually test the submitted contributions to ensure that the content works, thus ensuring a certain level of quality.
The fact that we haven’t had any really great new articles lately is because lelldorin and I are both very busy with our families.
You are all welcome to join us. I can also set up users for you.