This would mean you can sort by date (ignoring the time) or by time of day (ignoring the date), which seems a bit strange to me. We can improve the alignment of the text inside the column, but I don’t think two columns would be a great choice here?
Some people believe that more padding looks nicer. I am not one of those people, however I know many people who are.
It would be nice to have an option to increase the icon size and list view item spacing. We could for example have a submenu on List View with options for Mini or Large icons… again.
Airplane designers certainly do change the seat spacing every iteration!
I understand this might never be implemented, and I think both the reasons for keeping things as they are (default) and the case for the optional change (tidy) have been well explained.
You can tell by the Mail folder envelope icon being barely visible:
In any case, padding should really be a setting, and users should be able to adjust it to their liking. (If there is one, I couldn’t find it)
In this example, the increased padding makes the icons larger, more readable, and less cramped. It’s not change for change’s sake; it’s about streamlining and improving visibility for all the information, as we discussed and collaborated on above with the rest of the changes
That’s really great! I got a good chuckle out of the seat spacing in each iteration
Exactly! I find myself using Magnify just to see the icons!
The primary differentiator here is the label, not the icon.
[quote="jscipione, post:23, topic:16988”]
It would be nice to have an option to increase the icon size and list view item spacing.
[/quote]
It would be nice to have an icon size setting (if there is not one yet). Item spacing? I really cannot see the point, we are not trying to make it more tappable.
[quote="Nukacal, post:24, topic:16988”]
it’s about streamlining and improving visibility for all the information, as we discussed and collaborated on above with the rest of the changes
[/quote]
I hear this justification quite a lot with each new horrible UI design among various mediums, and it feels like we were displaying a lot more information with those low-resolution screens in the past, than we are doing now with our UHD monitors.
Why was it reverted?
That’s really nice! Any reason why it was reverted?
If there would be an option to increase line spacing / padding while also making the icons respond by getting bigger, then that solves it for me; and keeps things small and close together for anyone who prefers it that way
From hrev52496:
“This also removes the mini/large icon mode for list views; it’s now simply always matching your font size.”
Borders, depending on the look and feel, from my point of view should have a minimum base thickness and a maximum base thickness, so that there is a certain dynamism between themes, right?