@nephele please, I appreciate your time and effort, but keep it civilised and constructive.
It’s not OK to be judmental and negative towards other people’s work, even spreading FUD about illegal activity against EU law - believe me, I’m familiar with the GDPR, and it’s not only perfectly fine but absolutely common practice to reference external assets in your web pages.
Also, I accept your different taste, but I made a deliberate decision on how to present my own project and would kindly ask you to accept that.
It does the job well, I got very positive feedback, and the aim was not to build a minimalistic web site for purist web developers geeking out over the latest web standards, but to have a decent landing page with some glimpses into the features, and to appeal to potential partners and funding agencies, which couldn’t care less if it runs optimized for WebPositive.
Lastly, the “weird UI” you mention is a nod to Haiku and BeOS UX, heck you can even drag and move the tabs, these are sliding tabs - here, I spillede the Easter egg for you:)
If you don’t like it, I guess you have some different skin/UI hack on your Haiku installation…
That being said, I actually asked for feedback on the content, not on technicalities.
I can optimise later, but need people not familiar with Haiku to get it, mainly people of the personal knowledge management domain.
Rest assured, I take all constructive points into account for the optimising run, I also got some good points raised by grok, believe it or not, e.g. lazy loading and caching preview images (they are fetched by a dynamic workflow on Github btw, so it’s not just really static).
However I don’t see any performance impact on my local system or on mobile, and nobody complained about any such issues so far.
(OTOH just try to open a blog article on Medium, and WebPositive takes off…)
So let me ask again, content wise, do you get what the project does, do you think also people unfamiliar with Haiku will understand?