I’ve gotten a lot of mixed feedback on this one over the years
When we zip release (aka R1/Beta3) ISO’s, people complain we should offer them uncompressed. When we offer uncompressed ISO’s, people complain we should offer them compressed via zip.
Considerations:
- A lot of things will let you paste an ISO URL into them for “direct access”. These things don’t support zip’ed ISO’s (think cloud hosts, virtual KVM’s, Vagrant, image writers, etc)
- Uncompressing a zip generally requires the size of the zip plus the size of the extracted media on your system. Downloading an ISO directly requires less local space.
- The R1/Beta4 iso will be around 1.5G uncompressed
- The R1/Beta4 iso will be around 1.1G compressed via zip maximum compression.
- Offering both zip and iso may confuse users. (keep in mind that makes 4 available downloads for r1/beta4… two architectures, two image types)
- Most Linux distros offer only uncompressed iso downloads
Note: Nightly isn’t included in this. We will continue to ZIP nightly images no matter what… there are just too many. We’re talking strictly “stable release images”
So…
Should release ISO’s be zipped / compressed?
- Yes
- No
0 voters