Hi all,
I know that exception workflow is controversial, to say the least. I’m not here to determine if they are harmful or the way®. I personally prefer to limit them and use monadic tricks (std::optional, std::expected), but sometime it’s unavoidable (failure from a ctor, for example).
I’m looking for an explanation, resources, of why the Be Engineers chose not to use exceptions.
I’m having some hypothesis:
- wasn’t mature at the time anyway
- doesn’t play nice with multithreaded environments
- RAII wasn’t invented yet
- tradition
I couldn’t find anything in the archived newsletter myself
Thanks for your help!