Small comparative about power consumption

Hi have this laptot, a SONY VAIO model PCG-6S3M, and decided to check which OS spends more energy after boot, 5 minutes in idle mode as a experiment

The laptot have dos integrated GPU’s:
NVIDIA GEFORCE 8400MB
INTEL MOBILE GM965/GL

And it’s a:
INTEL CORE 2 DUO T750

With:
4 GB RAM

TEST WITH NVIDIA

NVIDIA GEFORCE 8400MB, WINDOWS 7 SP1 => 26-30w
" …" , VOID GNU/ LINUX 6.13 => 30-34w
"… , HAIKU R1/BETA4 => 40-44w

TEST WITH INTEL MOBILE
INTEL MOBILE GM965/GL, WINDOWS 7 SP1 => 21-30w
“…” , VOID GNU/LINUX 6.13 (with LXQT 1.3.0) => 25-33w
“…” , HAIKU R1/BETA4=> 30-35w

I did the same test in the nightly build and the power consumption increased slightly, maybe 2-3 watts more

3 Likes

Was that with power saving mode on or off in Haiku?

1 Like

I`m able to go idle into the 15-20w range in the Pentium 4 524 (Prescott).

2 Likes

With saving power on
NVIDIA 37-41w
Intel GMA 27-28w

2 Likes

Interesting results - thanks for this comparison.

2 Likes

There’s definitely a lot of low-hanging fruit for power-consumption optimization. For example, there’s a bunch of background operations which run every second which could probably be modified to run much less often when in power saving mode (or even reworked entirely to not need “polling.”)

I’m not sure if our power-saving mode even fully activates power-saving mode on the processor, for that matter…

4 Likes

New test now with a bigger machine

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4) @ 2.400GHz
GPU: AMD ATI Radeon HD 5000/6000/7350/8350
8 GB RAM

3 hard disk SATA

Monitor EIZO S2243W

You have to subtract 55 watts, which is the power consumption of the Eizo monitor.

WINDOWS 7: 160-170 WATTS
HAIKU R1/Beta4 x86_64 (power saving activated): 145-150 watts
VOID Kernel 6.5.6 with LXQT 1.3.0: 135-145
MINT 19.3: 140-155