Most tests found here for comparison:
I benchmarked 3 browsers on Haiku.
BezillaBrowser (BZ) 2.0.0.22pre vs Arora 0.10.2 vs Webpositive r459
Each category below is ordered from best to worst. From the results you can see how poorly BeZillaBrowser 2.0.0.x performs against the other two web browsers. Webpositive does very well and Arora fairly good too. Very good reason why Haiku requires a better browser than BeZillaBrowser 2.0
I noticed that haiku-os.org did not display correct with Arora.
UPDATE 1: Adding in test results for Firefox 3.6.3, Chrome 4.1.x running on Windows 7 64bit.
UPDATE 2: PeaceKeeper Benchmarks updated
Acid3 Test
Chrome(W): 100/100
Webpositive: 98/100
Arora: 98/100
Firefox(W): 94/100
BZ: 52/100
html5test
Chrome(W): 118/160
Firefox(W): 101/160
Webpositive: 73/160
Arora: 58/160
BZ: Failed To Run
CSS Selectors Test
Webpositive: From the 43 selectors 41 have passed, 0 are buggy and 2 are unsupported (Passed 576 out of 578 tests)
Arora: From the 43 selectors 41 have passed, 0 are buggy and 2 are unsupported (Passed 574 out of 578 tests)
BZ: From the 43 selectors 26 have passed, 10 are buggy and 7 are unsupported (Passed 357 out of 578 tests)
V8 - Google’s Javascript benchmark
Chrome(W): 3325
Webpositive: 537
Firefox(W): 435
Arora: 347
BZ: 50
Sunspider - Apple’s Webkit Javascript benchmark
Chrome(W): 659.6ms +/- 5.1%
Firefox(W): 1165.2ms +/- 2.1%
Webpositive: 1753.8ms +/- 0.6%
Arora: 3270.8ms +/- 0.4%
BZ: 24588.2ms +/- 1.0%
CSS Rendering (onLoad)
Arora: 61 ms
Webpositive: 173 ms
Chrome(W): 195 ms
Firefox(W): 233 ms
BZ: 720 ms
Table Rendering
Webpositive: 272 ms
Chrome(W): 725 ms
Arora: 729 ms
Firefox(W): 730 ms
BZ: 2585 ms
PeaceKeeper Benchmark
Chrome(W): 3374
Firefox(W): 2873
Arora: 1630 (updated)
BZ: 252
Webpositive: N/A - does not finish