On the closure of the "On LLM policy of HaikuPorts" thread

[us3r1d]

@Akakor

The majority of the voters are fine with LLM use

Actually, as it stands right now 58% of respondents to that survey stated that they wanted to either ban or discourage LLM use for translation on this forum. 42% said that it should be allowed with no commentary on it.

84% did say it should be allowed for translation on this forum, but half of those also said that its use should be discouraged in favor of non-LLM translators.

So, adding a statement to the forum policies that LLM-based language translation is allowed but we would prefer that users employ other translation technologies would be exactly in line with the current results of that survey.

[SURVEY] Policy proposals for LLM translators

All right, it seems discussion about LLMs for translation has mostly died down. Let’s see how the community at large feels about each of the proposed policies. First, which policy would you prefer? poll Second, which policy do you like the least? poll Now, how much do you like/dislike policy 1, which bans LLMs for translation? poll How much do you like/dislike policy 2, which allows LLMs for translation? poll How much do you like/dislike policy 3, which allows LLMs for translation, but enco…

Also, it’s important to remember that survey is only about LLM-based translation on the forum; it doesn’t ask about any other LLM use or LLM use in general.