Haiku results in BeRometer benchmark

1

http://haiku-os.pl/node/1493 - original link.

Thanks Diver - http://dev.haiku-os.org/ticket/5146 !
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15787359/BeRometer.zip - download
http://haikuware.com/directory/view-details/utilities/system-system-information/berometer

Unfortunately I not tested the alpha3, I have KDL during installation. Do not use Whetstone test, deadlocks Haiku!

Some results may be too short, go beyond the column boundary…

CPU: Athlon 64 3500+ Motherboard: GAK8NF-9 RAM: 1 GB GeIL PC3200 DDR RAM 2.5-3-3-6 DUAL CHANNEL GPU: Radeon HD 5450 512 MB HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 320 GB

Haiku-nightly-hrev44220-x86gcc2hybrid:
Graphics Lines Flushed
Graphics Lines Unflushed
Graphics Strings Flushed
Graphics Strings Unflushed
Graphics Ellipses Flushed
Graphics Ellipses Unflushed
Graphics Ellipses Unflushed Filled
Graphics Rectangles Flushed
Graphics Rectangles Unflushed
Graphics Rectangles Unflushed Filled
Graphics Polygons Flushed
Graphics Polygons Unflushed
Graphics Polygons Unflushed Filled
Strings Copy
Strings Compare
Memory
Savage
Ackerman
Fourier
Sieve
Disk File Creation
Disk File Deletion
Disk File Output
Disk File Input		 vectors/sec
vectors/sec
KiloChars/sec
KiloChars/sec
ellipses/sec
ellipses/sec
ellipses/sec
rectangles/sec
rectangles/sec
rectangles/sec
polygons/sec
polygons/sec
polygons/sec
MegaChars/sec
MegaChars/sec
MB/sec
KIPS
IPS
FLOPS
IPS
files/second
files/second
KB/sec
KB/sec		 117242
141858
1134.2
217.0
2020.8
2009.9
2499
9649.3
10109.7
26287.3
2294.1
2287.8
2591.1
834.5
469.9
275.2
3190.9
1947419
368.2
17771
3583
6411
265584
1085511

Haiku-nightly-hrev44220-x86gcc4hybrid:

Graphics Lines Flushed
Graphics Lines Unflushed
Graphics Strings Flushed
Graphics Strings Unflushed
Graphics Ellipses Flushed
Graphics Ellipses Unflushed
Graphics Ellipses Unflushed Filled
Graphics Rectangles Flushed
Graphics Rectangles Unflushed
Graphics Rectangles Unflushed Filled
Graphics Polygons Flushed
Graphics Polygons Unflushed
Graphics Polygons Unflushed Filled
Strings Copy
Strings Compare
Memory
Savage
Ackerman
Fourier
Sieve
Disk File Creation
Disk File Deletion
Disk File Output
Disk File Input		 vectors/sec
vectors/sec
KiloChars/sec
KiloChars/sec
ellipses/sec
ellipses/sec
ellipses/sec
rectangles/sec
rectangles/sec
rectangles/sec
polygons/sec
polygons/sec
polygons/sec
MegaChars/sec
MegaChars/sec
MB/sec
KIPS
IPS
FLOPS
IPS
files/second
files/second
KB/sec
KB/sec		 129772
156946
1234.2
242.1
1958.1
1949.5
2440
9493
9965.8
26080.9
2350.2
2345.7
2595.3
766.8
469.9
546.6
3185.5
1955671
366.9
17780.9
3995.7
6561
278737
1086513
2

Interesting. gcc2 or gcc4 doesn’t seem to make a difference besides with the “Memory” test where gcc4 is almost twice as fast.
This is the two tables from above merged plus the speedfactor gcc4/gcc2:

Haiku-nightly-hrev44220
							gcc2hybrid	gcc4hybrid	factor
Graphics Lines Flushed			vectors/sec	117242		129772		1.11
Graphics Lines Unflushed		vectors/sec	141858		156946		1.11
Graphics Strings Flushed		KiloChars/sec	1134.2		1234.2		1.09
Graphics Strings Unflushed		KiloChars/sec	217		242.1		1.12
Graphics Ellipses Flushed		ellipses/sec	2020.8		1958.1		0.96
Graphics Ellipses Unflushed		ellipses/sec	2009.9		1949.5		0.97
Graphics Ellipses Unflushed Filled	ellipses/sec	2499		2440		0.97
Graphics Rectangles Flushed		rectangles/sec	9649.3		9493		0.98
Graphics Rectangles Unflushed		rectangles/sec	10109.7		9965.8		0.98
Graphics Rectangles Unflushed Filled	rectangles/sec	26287.3		26080.9		0.99
Graphics Polygons Flushed		polygons/sec	2294.1		2350.2		1.02
Graphics Polygons Unflushed		polygons/sec	2287.8		2345.7		1.03
Graphics Polygons Unflushed Filled	polygons/sec	2591.1		2595.3		1.00
Strings Copy				MegaChars/sec	834.5		766.8		0.91
Strings Compare				MegaChars/sec	469.9		469.9		1.00
Memory					MB/sec		275.2		546.6		1.99
Savage					KIPS		3190.9		3185.5		0.99
Ackerman				IPS		1947419		1955671		1.00
Fourier					FLOPS		368.2		366.9		0.99
Sieve					IPS		17771		17780.9		1.00
Disk File Creation			files/second	3583		3995.7		1.12
Disk File Deletion			files/second	6411		6561		1.02
Disk File Output			KB/sec		265584		278737		1.05
Disk File Input				KB/sec		1085511		1086513		1.00
3

Also interesting, 1 core is faster than 2…
Sreenshot o BeRometer result window: Core2Duo, 2ghz, 2gb ram, nvidia 7600

Premislaus, how did go get from BeRometer’s stupid results format to your nice table?

Regards,
Humdinger

4

[quote=Humdinger]Also interesting, 1 core is faster than 2…
Sreenshot o BeRometer result window: Core2Duo, 2ghz, 2gb ram, nvidia 7600

Premislaus, how did go get from BeRometer’s stupid results format to your nice table?

Regards,
Humdinger[/quote]

Hi! I made four screenshots, then I tried OCR, with miserable results. But I got all the names of the tests. Afterward I rewrite the rest of this. Later, I wrote in Google “html table generator” :P.

As for the result, you should have more than me. Core 2 Duo is more efficient in the core to core than Athlon 64. Sometimes you have lower scores than me.

This benchmark is very old. It does not include changes made ​​in Haiku and new processor instructions. When it was written, it was not multi-core processors.

We need a new benchmark; Dhrystone, Whetstone, memory and disk performance, something for the graphics card, video and audio transcoding, audio latencies, raytracing, etc… With the ability to diagnose; temperature, CPU, GPU and PSU stress, SMART, bad sectors, fan speed control, etc. HaikuDoctor :). For example, Everest Home Edition, Orthos Prime.

Benchmark must examine the Haiku impact for performance. Would be nice if it was a constant application in Haiku( delivered with Haiku).

5

ok ok it’s been a few years, but are berometer sources available in some remote corner of the galaxy? :slight_smile: