Yes. Very interested Michel, though I think I wasn’t clear about my
Needs planning and streaming such users through “Non-developer oriented” streams, along with a “curated” release of Haiku that “just works”
idea. What I envisage is well outside the current Haiku development infrastructure with little impact on current development or developers, unless they engaged in doing it. (That is the different Streaming) In fact it would probably require close working with Mozilla or Brave or whatever fully featured Browser was chosen as THE basis, and a paradigm shift from the current developers. (That is part of the huge Planning) It is hard to explain without some people thinking it is being critical or saying things are being changed, but it only because Haiku seems to capable of it (from what I am actually running) that I am even imagining it. It is not some pie in the sky dream. It is could be done if people wanted to, and that is up to them.
Imagine the equivalent of a ChromeBook (now you can get cheap stuff on AliExpress and the like that make Chromebooks look very under-power so hardware and performance in not an issue (yes drivers are, but if built on specified hardware it would be selected to be compatible).
Unlike most developers here, most users do most of their stuff online in a web-browser or or web apps, and this is partly because personal software on the platforms costs and is a hassle for them. The array of existing apps already ported to Haiku would provide users the ability to pull some of their work back off the cloud (Google) and enjoy better speed and more control, without loosing any functionality.
While a mockup could be created with existing ported browsers (Both Iceweasle and Floorp look very promising until you try download
) working with the Browser developers would provide huge benefits, integration and performance gains. Given Mozilla is under pressure from Google and MSoft, it may be very keen on pushing its “own” platform to avoid the squeese skuldugery that Google and MS are engaging. There are other Web Browsers. If you view the Web Browser as an eco-system within an eco-system most of what people currently do can be done in the browser and the OS provide the platform. That is what I was meaning by a cut down system. By cut down I didn’t mean Haiku itself, I meant the package of software included, the main being a stable fully capable web browser plus a curated selection of software aimed at people who chat, watch online videos and take photos. That is the curated bit, curating the software to be shipped with the HaikuWebBook, not curating Haiku itself.
For that market the interface has to “match the market” and so the theming and desktop would need some developing for that streamed offering. While it is a dirty word on this forum, a sort of Distro. The difference is that if Haiku did the development it would be inhouse and operationally consistent with the existing mainline Haiku that exists as it is.
The finished HaikuWebBook Distro could be made available as a subscription, because that market expects to pay and it would have been worked on purely to support that market. If supplied on hardware it would be in the cost. Anyone wanting to access everything Haiku existing could do so as it is: no changes. Anyone with the HaikuWebBook could use it like a standard Haiku instal and load what they want from HaikuDepot (with no guarantee it will “just work” or special support. Any net profit would flow back in to support Haiku development (Your coffers).
Now there are many risks, problems and issues as has already been raised and will be further raised I am sure. Personally I think the software and even hardware can be resolved with some time and effort. The real risk is in the organization “growth” required to handle such a project, as that is where all the fighting and accusation starts. That is why it would need serious planning to fully implement and pull off. That was my planning requirement I identified (You guys seem very capable of planning development already), and I am talking hard nosed business plans and market research that no-one reading or writing this has much interest in it seems
Why? Obviously you can easily lose trying this sort of thing, if it is not something the market will buy enough to at least cover costs.
Imagined time frame if everything fell into place and the project started by Christmas is three years minimum, but real developers with relevant experience would be able to post more accurate estimates I am sure.
However: If haiku Org/Inc doesn’t do it, others may. Google took Linux and made Andriod, Chrome book … Apple took BSD and made something
. Mozilla could take Haiku and do it their way. Not likely maybe, but a possibility and opportunities arise from taking possibilities and making them work for you, if you can and if you want to. Maybe “others doing these things” is your preferred option.
My interest is simple and limited with the above being observation and speculation. Such a device would be good for my children and wife and seems like a cool thing to develop. De Googlising is all the rage, even though Google is my life line when I need to just do something and MS is more my long term perceived enemy of the people. I am hacking such a thing together for that purpose as we discuss, but that is a several orders of magnitude lower goal than the discussion above imagines.
Repeating that my ideas was separate and growth based to Haiku, Haiku org, Haiku Inc and everyone on this discussion, not trying to change anyone or anything, so please don’t respond as if this is a “hostile take-over” attempt. Your have a right to be concerned about how such a thing would effect the status quo, but it ain’t me who is doing anything other than what I said. Call the idea naive and ill conceived, because it is only a few days of musing, but please don’t flame war me.